Fix typo in function name

This commit is contained in:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2020-02-04 18:39:04 +01:00
parent 5c11632735
commit bc130b6858
6 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions

2
TODO
View File

@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ Features:
* the a-posteriori stopping of units bound to units that disappeared logic
should be reworked: there should be a queue of units, and we should only
enqeue stop jobs from a defer event that processes queue instead of
enqueue stop jobs from a defer event that processes queue instead of
right-away when we find a unit that is bound to one that doesn't exist
anymore. (similar to how the stop-unneeded queue has been reworked the same
way)

View File

@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
<para>This call is primarily useful for dealing with incoming method calls that may be processed only
after an additional asynchronous operation completes. One example are PolicyKit authorization requests
that are determined to be necessary to autorize a newly incoming method call: when the PolicyKit response
that are determined to be necessary to authorize a newly incoming method call: when the PolicyKit response
is received the original method call may be re-enqueued to process it again, this time with the
authorization result known.</para>
</refsect1>

View File

@ -685,7 +685,7 @@ global:
LIBSYSTEMD_245 {
global:
sd_bus_enqeue_for_read;
sd_bus_enqueue_for_read;
sd_bus_message_dump;
sd_bus_message_sensitive;
sd_event_add_child_pidfd;

View File

@ -4208,7 +4208,7 @@ _public_ int sd_bus_get_close_on_exit(sd_bus *bus) {
return bus->close_on_exit;
}
_public_ int sd_bus_enqeue_for_read(sd_bus *bus, sd_bus_message *m) {
_public_ int sd_bus_enqueue_for_read(sd_bus *bus, sd_bus_message *m) {
int r;
assert_return(bus, -EINVAL);
@ -4220,9 +4220,9 @@ _public_ int sd_bus_enqeue_for_read(sd_bus *bus, sd_bus_message *m) {
if (!BUS_IS_OPEN(bus->state))
return -ENOTCONN;
/* Re-enqeue a message for reading. This is primarily useful for PolicyKit-style authentication,
* where we want accept a message, then determine we need to interactively authenticate the user, and
* when we have that process the message again. */
/* Re-enqueue a message for reading. This is primarily useful for PolicyKit-style authentication,
* where we accept a message, then determine we need to interactively authenticate the user, and then
* we want to process the message again. */
r = bus_rqueue_make_room(bus);
if (r < 0)

View File

@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static int async_polkit_callback(sd_bus_message *reply, void *userdata, sd_bus_e
if (r < 0)
goto fail;
r = sd_bus_enqeue_for_read(sd_bus_message_get_bus(q->request), q->request);
r = sd_bus_enqueue_for_read(sd_bus_message_get_bus(q->request), q->request);
if (r < 0)
goto fail;

View File

@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ int sd_bus_process(sd_bus *bus, sd_bus_message **r);
int sd_bus_process_priority(sd_bus *bus, int64_t max_priority, sd_bus_message **r);
int sd_bus_wait(sd_bus *bus, uint64_t timeout_usec);
int sd_bus_flush(sd_bus *bus);
int sd_bus_enqeue_for_read(sd_bus *bus, sd_bus_message *m);
int sd_bus_enqueue_for_read(sd_bus *bus, sd_bus_message *m);
sd_bus_slot* sd_bus_get_current_slot(sd_bus *bus);
sd_bus_message* sd_bus_get_current_message(sd_bus *bus);