From e2da64918257e45f629b71b60347100e4cc5147b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Zbigniew=20J=C4=99drzejewski-Szmek?= Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 08:55:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] TODO: drop some networkd items MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit DUID/IAID — #2818, #2890, #3156, Scope – #6449, bond options — #10542, option 119: sd_network_get_domains/sd_network_get_search_domains, /proc/cmdline parsing – 426c1d385212e11cb, wait states — #14536. --- TODO | 9 +-------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index 792f2d4be1..fe794e28a3 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -1204,17 +1204,14 @@ Features: * networkd: - add more keys to [Route] and [Address] sections - add support for more DHCPv4 options (and, longer term, other kinds of dynamic config) - - add proper initrd support (in particular generate .network/.link files based on /proc/cmdline) - add reduced [Link] support to .network files - - add Scope= parsing option for [Network] - properly handle routerless dhcp leases - work with non-Ethernet devices - - add support for more bond options - dhcp: do we allow configuring dhcp routes on interfaces that are not the one we got the dhcp info from? - the DHCP lease data (such as NTP/DNS) is still made available when a carrier is lost on a link. It should be removed instantly. - expose in the API the following bits: - - option 15, domain name and/or option 119, search list + - option 15, domain name - option 12, hostname and/or option 81, fqdn - option 123, 144, geolocation - option 252, configure http proxy (PAC/wpad) @@ -1223,12 +1220,8 @@ Features: - allow Name= to be specified repeatedly in the [Match] section. Maybe also support Name=foo*|bar*|baz ? - duplicate address check for static IPs (like ARPCHECK in network-scripts) - - allow DUID/IAID to be customized, see issue #394. - whenever uplink info changes, make DHCP server send out FORCERENEW -* networkd-wait-online: - - make operstates to wait for configurable? - * dhcp: - figure out how much we can increase Maximum Message Size