Contributing branches and reverting (#9577)

Co-authored-by: Valentin Gagarin <valentin.gagarin@tweag.io>
This commit is contained in:
Robert Hensing 2023-12-11 12:26:31 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent da58c00ee0
commit 89cf53648c
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 42 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -282,3 +282,45 @@ See also the [format documentation](https://github.com/haskell/cabal/blob/master
Releases have a precomputed `rl-MAJOR.MINOR.md`, and no `rl-next.md`.
Set `buildUnreleasedNotes = true;` in `flake.nix` to build the release notes on the fly.
## Branches
- [`master`](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/commits/master)
The main development branch. All changes are approved and merged here.
When developing a change, create a branch based on the latest `master`.
Maintainers try to [keep it in a release-worthy state](#reverting).
- [`maintenance-*.*`](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/branches/all?query=maintenance)
These branches are the subject of backports only, and are
also [kept](#reverting) in a release-worthy state.
See [`maintainers/backporting.md`](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/blob/master/maintainers/backporting.md)
- [`latest-release`](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/tree/latest-release)
The latest patch release of the latest minor version.
See [`maintainers/release-process.md`](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/blob/master/maintainers/release-process.md)
- [`backport-*-to-*`](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/branches/all?query=backport)
Generally branches created by the backport action.
See [`maintainers/backporting.md`](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/blob/master/maintainers/backporting.md)
- [_other_](https://github.com/NixOS/nix/branches/all)
Branches that do not conform to the above patterns should be feature branches.
## Reverting
If a change turns out to be merged by mistake, or contain a regression, it may be reverted.
A revert is not a rejection of the contribution, but merely part of an effective development process.
It makes sure that development keeps running smoothly, with minimal uncertainty, and less overhead.
If maintainers have to worry too much about avoiding reverts, they would not be able to merge as much.
By embracing reverts as a good part of the development process, everyone wins.
However, taking a step back may be frustrating, so maintainers will be extra supportive on the next try.