picnoir/Systemd
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Systemd/namedev.h

97 lines
2.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

[PATCH] Initial namedev parsing of config files .permission parsing works, .config needs more work.
2003-07-17 10:24:51 +02:00
/*
* namedev.h
*
* Userspace devfs
*
* Copyright (C) 2003 Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
* Free Software Foundation version 2 of the License.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
* with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
* 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
*
*/
#ifndef NAMEDEV_H
#define NAMEDEV_H
[PATCH] udevdb prototype Here's an "idea" of what I had in mind for udevdb. Let me preface the code with a few remarks: 1) I was expecting to write this udevdb for udev to keep track of devices. I was planning an external package that depends upon udev to provide an external API to the udevdb database. The calls for the interface would be read only access. Not sure how you want to do packaging, if having a separate package is ok or having it included in udev. 2) I created it as it is because udev isn't a daemon. So, the open database call doesn't take any parameters. My plan was to create a udevdb_init function that took arguments for initializing the db to start, where you could specify in memory only or a file location. This can all be filled in. 3) I hacked the Makefile to get it to work. Not sure how you'd want that in the future. 4) This assumes TDB has been installed elsewhere, you would need to edit your Makefile and point it to the header and library locations. How do you want to do TDB in udev? Do you want to just reference it and make udev dependent on that package being installed. Or should we do what samba does and include a limited tdb version in udev? 5) Again, I hacked udev into your existing code. In the future, I'd probably make a function around the filling out the udevice before calling the store command. Didn't know if you wanted to change your add device function to use struct udevice rather than having everything separate. 6) Not sure what we should include in the udevice structure that's stored by udev. I made a stab at a first shot - we can add and remove of course, this was a first pass. I've come to realize - with you including libsysfs in udev, the "external" interface that references udevdb could make use of getting information from through libsysfs from sysfs and doesn't need to be in udevdb. 7) I could write a namedevdb for namedev's device management if you wanted.
2003-08-06 08:57:23 +02:00
#include "udev.h"
[PATCH] make struct config_device contain a struct device_attr instead of duplicating the mess.
2003-07-24 00:56:56 +02:00
#include "list.h"
[PATCH] Clean up the namedev interface a bit, making the code smaller...
2003-07-19 14:06:55 +02:00
struct sysfs_class_device;
[PATCH] make struct config_device contain a struct device_attr instead of duplicating the mess.
2003-07-24 00:56:56 +02:00
#define BUS_SIZE 30
#define FILE_SIZE 50
#define VALUE_SIZE 100
#define ID_SIZE 50
#define PLACE_SIZE 50
[PATCH] extend exec_program[] extend exec_program size to 100 chars cause: PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n" is too long :)
2003-12-30 10:08:02 +01:00
#define PROGRAM_SIZE 100
[PATCH] make struct config_device contain a struct device_attr instead of duplicating the mess.
2003-07-24 00:56:56 +02:00
[PATCH] don't rely on field order in namedev_parse o change the parsing to get a key from the rule and sort it into our list of known keys instead of expecting a special order o the key to match a sysfs file must be prependend by 'SYSFS_' now to match with the new parsing. (The config must be changed, but it's a bit more descriptive too.) o put names of fields in define's, like the name of the methods o update all tests and the man page
2003-12-17 08:36:19 +01:00
#define FIELD_BUS "BUS"
#define FIELD_SYSFS "SYSFS_"
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 06:39:05 +01:00
#define FIELD_ID "ID"
[PATCH] don't rely on field order in namedev_parse o change the parsing to get a key from the rule and sort it into our list of known keys instead of expecting a special order o the key to match a sysfs file must be prependend by 'SYSFS_' now to match with the new parsing. (The config must be changed, but it's a bit more descriptive too.) o put names of fields in define's, like the name of the methods o update all tests and the man page
2003-12-17 08:36:19 +01:00
#define FIELD_PLACE "PLACE"
#define FIELD_PROGRAM "PROGRAM"
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 06:39:05 +01:00
#define FIELD_RESULT "RESULT"
[PATCH] don't rely on field order in namedev_parse o change the parsing to get a key from the rule and sort it into our list of known keys instead of expecting a special order o the key to match a sysfs file must be prependend by 'SYSFS_' now to match with the new parsing. (The config must be changed, but it's a bit more descriptive too.) o put names of fields in define's, like the name of the methods o update all tests and the man page
2003-12-17 08:36:19 +01:00
#define FIELD_KERNEL "KERNEL"
#define FIELD_NAME "NAME"
#define FIELD_SYMLINK "SYMLINK"
[PATCH] udev - CALLOUT is PROGRAM now replace CALLOUT by PROGRAM and fix old rule format
2004-01-14 03:31:18 +01:00
#define PROGRAM_MAXARG 10
[PATCH] add ability to have up to 5 SYSFS_ file/value pairs for the LABEL rule.
2003-12-23 07:31:35 +01:00
#define MAX_SYSFS_PAIRS 5
struct sysfs_pair {
char file[FILE_SIZE];
char value[VALUE_SIZE];
};
[PATCH] make struct config_device contain a struct device_attr instead of duplicating the mess.
2003-07-24 00:56:56 +02:00
struct config_device {
struct list_head node;
char bus[BUS_SIZE];
char id[ID_SIZE];
char place[PLACE_SIZE];
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 06:39:05 +01:00
char kernel[NAME_SIZE];
char program[PROGRAM_SIZE];
char result[PROGRAM_SIZE];
[PATCH] fix permission handling logic Now we can handle wildcards properly within the permission file.
2003-12-04 03:33:58 +01:00
char name[NAME_SIZE];
[PATCH] experimental (very simple) SYMLINK creation > > here is a experimental symlink creation patch - for discussion, > > in which direction we should go. > > It is possible now to define SYMLINK= after the NAME= in udev.rules. > > The link is relative to the node, but the path is not optimized now > > if the node and the link are in the same nested directory. > > Only one link is supported, cause i need to sleep now :) > > > > 06-simple-symlink-creation.diff > > simple symlink creation > > reorganized udev-remove to have access to the symlink field > > subdir creation/removal are functions now > > udev-test.pl tests for link creation/removal Here is a new version with relative link target path optimization an better tests in udev-test.pl: LABEL, BUS="scsi", vendor="IBM-ESXS", NAME="1/2/a/b/node", SYMLINK="1/2/c/d/symlink" Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_node: symlink 'udev-root/1/2/c/d/symlink' to node '1/2/a/b/node' requested Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_path: created 'udev-root/1/2/c' Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_path: created 'udev-root/1/2/c/d' Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_node: symlink(../../a/b/node, udev-root/1/2/c/d/symlink)
2003-12-07 18:12:07 +01:00
char symlink[NAME_SIZE];
[PATCH] add ability to have up to 5 SYSFS_ file/value pairs for the LABEL rule.
2003-12-23 07:31:35 +01:00
struct sysfs_pair sysfs_pair[MAX_SYSFS_PAIRS];
[PATCH] add udev logging to info log On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:14:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:10:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Clay Haapala wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Chris Friesen spake thusly: > > > > > > > > Maybe for ones with a matching rule, you could print something like: > > > > > > > > > > > Is the act of printing/syslogging a rule in an of itself? > > > > No, as currently the only way stuff ends up in the syslog is if > > DEBUG=true is used on the build line. > > > > But it's sounding like we might want to change that... :) > > How about this in the syslog after connect/disconnect? > > Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/udev.rules' at line 17 applied, 'video*' becomes 'video/webcam%n' > Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: creating device node '/udev/video/webcam0' > Jan 15 05:07:47 pim udev[28015]: removing device node '/udev/video/webcam0' Here is a slightly better version. I've created a logging.h file and moved the debug macros from udev.h in there. If you type: 'make' - you will get a binary that prints one or two lines to syslog if a device node is created or deleted 'make LOG=false' - you get a binary that prints asolutely nothing 'make DEBUG=true' - the same as today, it will print all debug lines
2004-01-16 06:53:20 +01:00
int config_line;
[PATCH] fix permission handling logic Now we can handle wildcards properly within the permission file.
2003-12-04 03:33:58 +01:00
};
struct perm_device {
struct list_head node;
[PATCH] overall whitespace + debug text conditioning 01-overall-whitespace+debug-text-conditioning.diff o cleanup whitespace o clarify a few comments o enclose all printed debug string values in ''
2003-11-25 07:27:17 +01:00
[PATCH] got rid of struct device_attr namedev.c is still a mess, that's up next after testing...
2003-10-22 07:28:32 +02:00
char name[NAME_SIZE];
char owner[OWNER_SIZE];
char group[GROUP_SIZE];
mode_t mode;
[PATCH] make struct config_device contain a struct device_attr instead of duplicating the mess.
2003-07-24 00:56:56 +02:00
};
[PATCH] split out the namedev config parsing logic to namedev_parse.c
2003-12-03 03:38:30 +01:00
extern struct list_head config_device_list;
[PATCH] fix permission handling logic Now we can handle wildcards properly within the permission file.
2003-12-04 03:33:58 +01:00
extern struct list_head perm_device_list;
[PATCH] make struct config_device contain a struct device_attr instead of duplicating the mess.
2003-07-24 00:56:56 +02:00
[PATCH] Initial namedev parsing of config files .permission parsing works, .config needs more work.
2003-07-17 10:24:51 +02:00
extern int namedev_init(void);
[PATCH] got rid of struct device_attr namedev.c is still a mess, that's up next after testing...
2003-10-22 07:28:32 +02:00
extern int namedev_name_device(struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev, struct udevice *dev);
[PATCH] split out the namedev config parsing logic to namedev_parse.c
2003-12-03 03:38:30 +01:00
extern int namedev_init_permissions(void);
[PATCH] add support for a main udev config file, udev.conf. the older udev.config file is now called udev.rules. This allows us to better control configuration values, and move away from the environment variables.
2003-12-03 10:08:46 +01:00
extern int namedev_init_rules(void);
[PATCH] split out the namedev config parsing logic to namedev_parse.c
2003-12-03 03:38:30 +01:00
[PATCH] fix permission handling logic Now we can handle wildcards properly within the permission file.
2003-12-04 03:33:58 +01:00
extern int add_perm_dev(struct perm_device *new_dev);
[PATCH] split out the namedev config parsing logic to namedev_parse.c
2003-12-03 03:38:30 +01:00
extern void dump_config_dev(struct config_device *dev);
extern void dump_config_dev_list(void);
[PATCH] fix permission handling logic Now we can handle wildcards properly within the permission file.
2003-12-04 03:33:58 +01:00
extern void dump_perm_dev(struct perm_device *dev);
extern void dump_perm_dev_list(void);
[PATCH] Initial namedev parsing of config files .permission parsing works, .config needs more work.
2003-07-17 10:24:51 +02:00
[PATCH] add support for a main udev config file, udev.conf. the older udev.config file is now called udev.rules. This allows us to better control configuration values, and move away from the environment variables.
2003-12-03 10:08:46 +01:00
extern int get_pair(char **orig_string, char **left, char **right);
[PATCH] Initial namedev parsing of config files .permission parsing works, .config needs more work.
2003-07-17 10:24:51 +02:00
#endif
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink