resolved: use DNS_ANSWER_FOREACH instead of for

This commit is contained in:
Dmitry Rozhkov 2018-01-03 15:00:27 +02:00
parent cfcc8dcc86
commit c1227a1840
1 changed files with 6 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@ -958,7 +958,7 @@ int dns_scope_notify_conflict(DnsScope *scope, DnsResourceRecord *rr) {
}
void dns_scope_check_conflicts(DnsScope *scope, DnsPacket *p) {
unsigned i;
DnsResourceRecord *rr;
int r;
assert(scope);
@ -989,25 +989,24 @@ void dns_scope_check_conflicts(DnsScope *scope, DnsPacket *p) {
log_debug("Checking for conflicts...");
for (i = 0; i < p->answer->n_rrs; i++) {
DNS_ANSWER_FOREACH(rr, p->answer) {
/* No conflict if it is DNS-SD RR used for service enumeration. */
if (dns_resource_key_is_dnssd_ptr(p->answer->items[i].rr->key))
if (dns_resource_key_is_dnssd_ptr(rr->key))
continue;
/* Check for conflicts against the local zone. If we
* found one, we won't check any further */
r = dns_zone_check_conflicts(&scope->zone, p->answer->items[i].rr);
r = dns_zone_check_conflicts(&scope->zone, rr);
if (r != 0)
continue;
/* Check for conflicts against the local cache. If so,
* send out an advisory query, to inform everybody */
r = dns_cache_check_conflicts(&scope->cache, p->answer->items[i].rr, p->family, &p->sender);
r = dns_cache_check_conflicts(&scope->cache, rr, p->family, &p->sender);
if (r <= 0)
continue;
dns_scope_notify_conflict(scope, p->answer->items[i].rr);
dns_scope_notify_conflict(scope, rr);
}
}