barrier: explicitly ignore return values of barrier_place()

The barrier implementation tracks remote states internally. There is no
need to check the return value of any barrier_*() function if the caller
is not interested in the result. The barrier helpers only return the state
of the remote side, which is usually not interesting as later calls to
barrier_sync() will catch this, anyway.

Shut up coverity by explicitly ignoring return values of barrier_place()
if we're not interested in it.
This commit is contained in:
David Herrmann 2014-11-04 09:49:43 +01:00
parent 44dd2c6e86
commit dfb05a1cf5
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View file

@ -3371,7 +3371,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
/* Tell the parent that we are ready, and that
* it can cgroupify us to that we lack access
* to certain devices and resources. */
barrier_place(&barrier);
(void)barrier_place(&barrier);
if (chdir(arg_directory) < 0) {
log_error("chdir(%s) failed: %m", arg_directory);
@ -3550,7 +3550,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
/* Notify the child that the parent is ready with all
* its setup, and that the child can now hand over
* control to the code to run inside the container. */
barrier_place(&barrier);
(void)barrier_place(&barrier);
r = sd_event_new(&event);
if (r < 0) {

View file

@ -91,6 +91,6 @@ static inline bool barrier_is_aborted(Barrier *b) {
}
static inline bool barrier_place_and_sync(Barrier *b) {
barrier_place(b);
(void)barrier_place(b);
return barrier_sync(b);
}