tmpfiles: let's bump RLIMIT_NOFILE for tmpfiles

We potentially might descent into quite deep directory trees. Let's
hence make sure we can allocate a lot of fds.

(This reflects the fact that glibc nftw() and friends have some logic in
place to reduce fd usage while descending into directory trees. Doing so
is a bit nasty I think, and given that fds are basically free now, if we
ask for them, lte's just protect ourselves and make use of that)

(No, I am not aware of a real-world case where this was necessary, but
let's better be safe than sorry)
This commit is contained in:
Lennart Poettering 2019-01-18 16:34:52 +01:00
parent aa1f2e52e8
commit e5358401b5
1 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
#include "path-lookup.h"
#include "path-util.h"
#include "pretty-print.h"
#include "rlimit-util.h"
#include "rm-rf.h"
#include "selinux-util.h"
#include "set.h"
@ -3175,6 +3176,9 @@ static int run(int argc, char *argv[]) {
log_setup_service();
/* Descending down file system trees might take a lot of fds */
(void) rlimit_nofile_bump(HIGH_RLIMIT_NOFILE);
if (arg_user) {
r = user_config_paths(&config_dirs);
if (r < 0)