test-bus-introspect is also applied to the tables from test-bus-vtable.c.
test-bus-vtable.c is also used as C++ sources to produce test-bus-vtable-cc,
and our hashmap headers are not C++ compatible. So let's do the introspection
part only in the C version.
Just moving code around, in preparation to allow the content creation
part to be used in other places.
On the surface of things, introspect_path() should be in bus-introspect.c, but
introspect_path() uses many static helper functions in bus-objects.c, so moving
it would require all of them to be exposed, which is too much trouble.
test-bus-introspect is updated to actually write the closing bracket.
We would check the size of sd_bus_vtable entries, requring one of the two known
sizes. But we should be able to extend the structure in the future, by adding
new fields, without breaking backwards compatiblity.
Incidentally, this check was what caused -EINVAL failures before, when programs
were compiled with systemd-242 and run with older libsystemd.
In 856ad2a86b sd_bus_add_object_vtable() and
sd_bus_add_fallback_vtable() were changed to take an updated sd_bus_vtable[]
array with additional 'features' and 'names' fields in the union.
The commit tried to check whether the old or the new table format is used, by
looking at the vtable[0].x.start.element_size field, on the assumption that the
added fields caused the structure size to grow. Unfortunately, this assumption
was false, and on arm32 (at least), the structure size is unchanged.
In libsystemd we use symbol versioning and a major.minor.patch semantic
versioning of the library name (major equals the number in the so-name). When
systemd-242 was released, the minor number was (correctly) bumped, but this is
not enough, because no new symbols were added or symbol versions changed. This
means that programs compiled with the new systemd headers and library could be
successfully linked to older versions of the library. For example rpm only
looks at the so-name and the list of versioned symbols, completely ignoring the
major.minor numbers in the library name. But the older library does not
understand the new vtable format, and would return -EINVAL after failing the
size check (on those architectures where the structure size did change, i.e.
all 64 bit architectures).
To force new libsystemd (with the functions that take the updated
sd_bus_vtable[] format) to be used, let's pull in a dummy symbol from the table
definition. This is a bit wasteful, because a dummy pointer has to be stored,
but the effect is negligible. In particular, the pointer doesn't even change
the size of the structure because if fits in an unused area in the union.
The number stored in the new unsigned integer is not checked anywhere. If the
symbol exists, we already know we have the new version of the library, so an
additional check would not tell us anything.
An alternative would be to make sd_bus_add_{object,fallback}_vtable() versioned
symbols, using .symver linker annotations. We would provide
sd_bus_add_{object,fallback}_vtable@LIBSYSTEMD_221 (for backwards
compatibility) and e.g. sd_bus_add_{object,fallback}_vtable@@LIBSYSTEMD_242
(the default) with the new implementation. This would work too, but is more
work. We would have to version at least those two functions. And it turns out
that the .symver linker instructions have to located in the same compilation
unit as the function being annotated. We first compile libsystemd.a, and then
link it into libsystemd.so and various other targets, including
libsystemd-shared.so, and the nss modules. If the .symver annotations were
placed next to the function definitions (in bus-object.c), they would influence
all targets that link libsystemd.a, and cause problems, because those functions
should not be exported there. To export them only in libsystemd.so, compilation
would have to be rearranged, so that the functions exported in libsystemd.so
would not be present in libsystemd.a, but a separate compilation unit containg
them and the .symver annotations would be linked solely into libsystemd.so.
This is certainly possible, but more work than the approach in this patch.
856ad2a86b has one more issue: it relies on the
undefined fields in sd_bus_vtable[] array to be zeros. But the structure
contains a union, and fields of the union do not have to be zero-initalized by
the compiler. This means that potentially, we could have garbarge values there,
for example when reading the old vtable format definition from the new function
implementation. In practice this should not be an issue at all, because vtable
definitions are static data and are placed in the ro-data section, which is
fully initalized, so we know that those undefined areas will be zero. Things
would be different if somebody defined the vtable array on the heap or on the
stack. Let's just document that they should zero-intialize the unused areas
in this case.
The symbol checking code had to be updated because otherwise gcc warns about a
cast from unsigned to a pointer.
Media Access Control Security (MACsec) is an 802.1AE IEEE
industry-standard security technology that provides secure
communication for all traffic on Ethernet links.
MACsec provides point-to-point security on Ethernet links between
directly connected nodes and is capable of identifying and preventing
most security threats, including denial of service, intrusion,
man-in-the-middle, masquerading, passive wiretapping, and playback attacks.
Closes#5754
We would accept a message with 40k signature and spend a lot of time iterating
over the nested arrays. Let's just reject it early, as we do for !gvariant
messages.
Apparently by the C standard "int" bitfields can have any signedness
(unlike non-bitfield declarations which are "signed" if the signedness
is not specified).
Let's fix the LGTM warning about this hence and be explicit that we mean
"signed" here.
When compiled with -DNDEBUG, we get warnings about set-but-unused variables.
In general, it's not something we care about, but since removing those
variables arguably makes the code nicer, let's just to it in this case.
Let's be helpful to static analyzers which care about whether we
knowingly ignore return values. We do in these cases, since they are
usually part of error paths.
As general principle, we generally check command line args first, the
enviroment second, and external configuration and system state only later.
In case of the invocation ID, checking the keyring before the environment
was implemented as a poor-man's security measure. But this is not really
useful, since we're moving within the same security boundary. So let's just
do the expected thing, and check environment first.
Prompted by https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/11991#issuecomment-474647652.
Fixes#12036.
../../../src/systemd/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-objects.c: In function ‘add_object_vtable_internal’:
../../../src/systemd/src/basic/macro.h:423:19: error: duplicate case value
Introduced in 6d586a1371.
Reported by Felix Riemann in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685286.
Reproducer:
for i in `seq 1 100`; do gdbus call --session -d org.freedesktop.systemd1 -m org.freedesktop.systemd1.Manager.StartUnit -o "/$(for x in `seq 0 28000`; do echo -n $x; done)" & done
The dbus external authentication takes as optional argument the UID the
sender wants to authenticate as. This uid is purely optional. The
AF_UNIX socket already conveys the same information through the
auxiliary socket data, so we really don't have to provide that
information.
Unfortunately, there is no way to send empty arguments, since they are
interpreted as "missing argument", which has a different meaning. The
SASL negotiation thus changes from:
AUTH EXTERNAL <uid>
NEGOTIATE_UNIX_FD (optional)
BEGIN
to:
AUTH EXTERNAL
DATA
NEGOTIATE_UNIX_FD (optional)
BEGIN
And thus the replies we expect as a client change from:
OK <server-id>
AGREE_UNIX_FD (optional)
to:
DATA
OK <server-id>
AGREE_UNIX_FD (optional)
Since the old sd-bus server implementation used the wrong reply for
"AUTH" requests that do not carry the arguments inlined, we decided to
make sd-bus clients accept this as well. Hence, sd-bus now allows
"OK <server-id>\r\n" replies instead of "DATA\r\n" replies.
Signed-off-by: David Rheinsberg <david.rheinsberg@gmail.com>
The correct way to reply to "AUTH <protocol>" without any payload is to
send "DATA" rather than "OK". The "DATA" reply triggers the client to
respond with the requested payload.
In fact, adding the data as hex-encoded argument like
"AUTH <protocol> <hex-data>" is an optimization that skips the "DATA"
roundtrip. The standard way to perform an authentication is to send the
"DATA" line.
This commit fixes sd-bus to properly send the "DATA" line. Surprisingly
no existing implementation depends on this, as they all pass the data
directly as argument to "AUTH". This will not work if we want to pass
an empty argument, though.
Signed-off-by: David Rheinsberg <david.rheinsberg@gmail.com>
Previously, 'degraded' state is ambiguous for bonding or bridge master:
1. one or more slave interfaces does not have carrier,
2. no link local address is assigned to the master,
3. combination of the above two.
This makes the above case 1 and 3 are in the new 'degraded-carrier'
state, and makes 'degraded' state as all slaves are active but no
link local address on master.
