chase_symlinks() would return negative on error, and either a non-negative status
or a non-negative fd when CHASE_OPEN was given. This made the interface quite
complicated, because dependning on the flags used, we would get two different
"types" of return object. Coverity was always confused by this, and flagged
every use of chase_symlinks() without CHASE_OPEN as a resource leak (because it
would this that an fd is returned). This patch uses a saparate output parameter,
so there is no confusion.
(I think it is OK to have functions which return either an error or an fd. It's
only returning *either* an fd or a non-fd that is confusing.)
The default message for ENOSPC is very misleading: it says that the disk is
filled, but in fact the inotify watch limit is the problem.
So let's introduce and use a wrapper that simply calls inotify_add_watch(2) and
which fixes the error message up in case ENOSPC is returned.
This flag can be used to make chase_symlinks() emit a warning when it
encounters an error.
Such flag can be useful for generating a comprehensive and detailed warning
since chase_symlinks() can generate a warning with a full context.
For now only warnings for unsafe transitions are produced.
This is the counterpiece to the boot counting implemented in
systemd-boot: if a boot is detected as successful we mark drop the
counter again from the booted snippet or kernel image.
This flag mimics what "O_NOFOLLOW|O_PATH" does for open(2) that is
chase_symlinks() will not resolve the final pathname component if it's a
symlink and instead will return a file descriptor referring to the symlink
itself.
Note: if CHASE_SAFE is also passed, no safety checking is performed on the
transition done if the symlink would have been followed.
We often open the parent directory of a path. Let's add a common helper
for that, that shortens our code a bit and adds some extra safety
checks, for example it will fail if used on the root directory (which
doesn't really have a parent).
The helper is actually generalized from a function in btrfs-util.[ch]
which already existed for this purpose.
These lines are generally out-of-date, incomplete and unnecessary. With
SPDX and git repository much more accurate and fine grained information
about licensing and authorship is available, hence let's drop the
per-file copyright notice. Of course, removing copyright lines of others
is problematic, hence this commit only removes my own lines and leaves
all others untouched. It might be nicer if sooner or later those could
go away too, making git the only and accurate source of authorship
information.
This part of the copyright blurb stems from the GPL use recommendations:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html
The concept appears to originate in times where version control was per
file, instead of per tree, and was a way to glue the files together.
Ultimately, we nowadays don't live in that world anymore, and this
information is entirely useless anyway, as people are very welcome to
copy these files into any projects they like, and they shouldn't have to
change bits that are part of our copyright header for that.
hence, let's just get rid of this old cruft, and shorten our codebase a
bit.
Let's always write "1 << 0", "1 << 1" and so on, except where we need
more than 31 flag bits, where we write "UINT64(1) << 0", and so on to force
64bit values.
This simplifies the use of tempfiles in tests and fixes "leaked"
temporary files in test-fileio, test-catalog, test-conf-parser.
Not the whole tree is converted.
If the flag is set only a single step of the normalization is executed,
and the resulting path is returned.
This allows callers to normalize piecemeal, taking into account every
single intermediary path of the normalization.
Files which are installed as-is (any .service and other unit files, .conf
files, .policy files, etc), are left as is. My assumption is that SPDX
identifiers are not yet that well known, so it's better to retain the
extended header to avoid any doubt.
I also kept any copyright lines. We can probably remove them, but it'd nice to
obtain explicit acks from all involved authors before doing that.
This rearranges chase_symlinks() a bit: if no special flags are
specified it will now revert to behaviour before
b12d25a8d6. However, if the new
CHASE_TRAIL_SLASH flag is specified it will follow the behaviour
introduced by that commit.
I wasn't sure which one to make the beaviour that requires specification
of a flag to enable. I opted to make the "append trailing slash"
behaviour the one to enable by a flag, following the thinking that the
function should primarily be used to generate a normalized path, and I
am pretty sure a path without trailing slash is the more "normalized"
one, as the trailing slash is not really a part of it, but merely a
"decorator" that tells various system calls to generate ENOTDIR if the
path doesn't refer to a path.
Or to say this differently: if the slash was part of normalization then
we really should add it in all cases when the final path is a directory,
not just when the user originally specified it.
Fixes: #8544
Replaces: #8545
This usually is very annoying to users who then cannot log in, so
make sure we always warn if that happens (selinux, or whatever other reason).
This reverts a790812cb3.
This new helper not only removes a file from a directory but also
ensures its space on disk is deallocated, by either punching a hole over
the full file or truncating the file afterwards if the file's link
counter is 0. This is useful in "vacuuming" algorithms to ensure that
client's can't keep the disk space the vacuuming is supposed to recover
pinned simply by keeping an fd open to it.
The new flag returns the O_PATH fd of the final component, which may be
converted into a proper fd by open()ing it again through the
/proc/self/fd/xyz path.
Together with O_SAFE this provides us with a somewhat safe way to open()
files in directories potentially owned by unprivileged code, where we
want to refuse operation if any symlink tricks are played pointing to
privileged files.
When the flag is specified we won't transition to a privilege-owned
file or directory from an unprivileged-owned one. This is useful when
privileged code wants to load data from a file unprivileged users have
write access to, and validates the ownership, but want's to make sure
that no symlink games are played to read a root-owned system file
belonging to a different context.
We should be careful with errno in cleanup functions, and not alter it
under any circumstances. In the safe_close cleanup handlers we are
already safe in that regard, but let's add similar protections on other
cleanup handlers that invoke system calls.
Why bother? Cleanup handlers insert code at function return in
non-obvious ways. Hence, code that sets errno and returns should not be
confused by us overrding the errno from a cleanup handler.
This is a paranoia fix only, I am not aware where this actually mattered
in real-life situations.
Linux doesn't have faccess(), hence let's emulate it. Linux has access()
and faccessat() but neither allows checking the access rights of an fd
passed in directly.
If a path passes though an autofs filesystem, then accessing
the path might trigger and automount. As systemd-tmpfiles is run before
the network is up, and as automounts are often used for networked
filesystems, this can cause a deadlock.
So chase_symlinks is enhance to accept a new flag which tells it
to check for autofs, and return -EREMOTE if autofs is found.
tmpfiles is changed to check just before acting on a path so that it
can avoid autofs even if a symlink was created earlier by tmpfiles
that would send this path through an autofs.
This fixes a deadlock that happens when /home is listed in /etc/fstab as
x-systemd.automount for an NFS directory.
Lennart Poettering