We would accept a message with 40k signature and spend a lot of time iterating
over the nested arrays. Let's just reject it early, as we do for !gvariant
messages.
Apparently by the C standard "int" bitfields can have any signedness
(unlike non-bitfield declarations which are "signed" if the signedness
is not specified).
Let's fix the LGTM warning about this hence and be explicit that we mean
"signed" here.
When compiled with -DNDEBUG, we get warnings about set-but-unused variables.
In general, it's not something we care about, but since removing those
variables arguably makes the code nicer, let's just to it in this case.
Let's be helpful to static analyzers which care about whether we
knowingly ignore return values. We do in these cases, since they are
usually part of error paths.
As general principle, we generally check command line args first, the
enviroment second, and external configuration and system state only later.
In case of the invocation ID, checking the keyring before the environment
was implemented as a poor-man's security measure. But this is not really
useful, since we're moving within the same security boundary. So let's just
do the expected thing, and check environment first.
Prompted by https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/11991#issuecomment-474647652.
Fixes#12036.
../../../src/systemd/src/libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-objects.c: In function ‘add_object_vtable_internal’:
../../../src/systemd/src/basic/macro.h:423:19: error: duplicate case value
Introduced in 6d586a1371.
Reported by Felix Riemann in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685286.
Reproducer:
for i in `seq 1 100`; do gdbus call --session -d org.freedesktop.systemd1 -m org.freedesktop.systemd1.Manager.StartUnit -o "/$(for x in `seq 0 28000`; do echo -n $x; done)" & done
The dbus external authentication takes as optional argument the UID the
sender wants to authenticate as. This uid is purely optional. The
AF_UNIX socket already conveys the same information through the
auxiliary socket data, so we really don't have to provide that
information.
Unfortunately, there is no way to send empty arguments, since they are
interpreted as "missing argument", which has a different meaning. The
SASL negotiation thus changes from:
AUTH EXTERNAL <uid>
NEGOTIATE_UNIX_FD (optional)
BEGIN
to:
AUTH EXTERNAL
DATA
NEGOTIATE_UNIX_FD (optional)
BEGIN
And thus the replies we expect as a client change from:
OK <server-id>
AGREE_UNIX_FD (optional)
to:
DATA
OK <server-id>
AGREE_UNIX_FD (optional)
Since the old sd-bus server implementation used the wrong reply for
"AUTH" requests that do not carry the arguments inlined, we decided to
make sd-bus clients accept this as well. Hence, sd-bus now allows
"OK <server-id>\r\n" replies instead of "DATA\r\n" replies.
Signed-off-by: David Rheinsberg <david.rheinsberg@gmail.com>
The correct way to reply to "AUTH <protocol>" without any payload is to
send "DATA" rather than "OK". The "DATA" reply triggers the client to
respond with the requested payload.
In fact, adding the data as hex-encoded argument like
"AUTH <protocol> <hex-data>" is an optimization that skips the "DATA"
roundtrip. The standard way to perform an authentication is to send the
"DATA" line.
This commit fixes sd-bus to properly send the "DATA" line. Surprisingly
no existing implementation depends on this, as they all pass the data
directly as argument to "AUTH". This will not work if we want to pass
an empty argument, though.
Signed-off-by: David Rheinsberg <david.rheinsberg@gmail.com>
Previously, 'degraded' state is ambiguous for bonding or bridge master:
1. one or more slave interfaces does not have carrier,
2. no link local address is assigned to the master,
3. combination of the above two.
This makes the above case 1 and 3 are in the new 'degraded-carrier'
state, and makes 'degraded' state as all slaves are active but no
link local address on master.
When enabled, three samples are used to determine the value of a
received bit by majority rule.
This patch adds support for the TripleSampling= option in the [CAN]
section of .network files.
Same as with the other users, any non-trivial use of the objects requires
use from a single thread only or external locking. Using atomic operations
just for reference counts is not useful.
The sd-hwdb objects cannot be used concurrently from two threads in any
meaningful way, because query and iteration operations modify the object.
Thus atomic reference counts are pointless.
We had atomic counters, but all other operations were non-serialized. This
means that concurrent access to the bus object was only safe if _all_ threads
were doing read-only access. Even sending of messages from threads would not be
possible, because after sending of the message we usually want to remove it
from the send queue in the bus object, which would race. Let's just kill this.
Yu Watanabe