Currently the systemd-shutdown command attempts to stop swaps, DM
(crypt, LVM2) and loop devices, but it doesn't attempt to stop MD
RAID devices, which means that if the RAID is set up on crypt,
loop, etc. device, it won't be able to stop those underlying devices.
This code extends the shutdown application to also attempt stopping
the MD RAID devices.
Signed-off-by: Hubert Kario <hubert@kario.pl>
The directory backend needs a file system path, and not a raw block
device. That's only supported for the LUKS2 backend.
Let's make this clearer in the man page and also generate a better error
message if attempted anyway.
Fixes: #17068
When exiting, let's explicitly wait for our worker processes to finish
first. That's useful if unmounting of /home/ is scheduled to happen
right after homed is down, as we then can be sure that the home
directories are properly unmounted and detached by the time homed is
fully terminated (otherwise it might happen that our worker gets killed
by the service manager, thus leaving the home directory and its backing
devices up/left for auto-clean which might be async).
Likely fixes#16842
When debugging homed while being logged into a user account manged by
homed it is a good idea to be able to run a second copy of homed. In
order to not collide with its AF_UNIX socket and bus name use, let's add
a new env var $SYSTEMD_HOME_DEBUG_SUFFIX, when set the busnames/socket
names are suffixed by it. When setting this while debugging one can
invoke an additional copy without interfering with the host one.
It's just too useful to immediately see with "systemd-dissect" what
"systemd-repart" generated for us without having to populate it with
/etc/os-release. Hence let's log a message if /etc/os-release is
missing, but proceed otherwise and show the partition table.
Let's suppress the secondary arch data, since we never ever want to
mount it if we found the primary arch.
Previously we only suppressed in the Verity case, but there's little
reason to entertain the idea of a secondary arch in non-Verity
environments either, we are not going to use them, and should not do
decryption or anything like that.
Uppercase first char of log message, and indicate correct program name.
Reindent comment table at one place.
Use correct, specific, enum type at one more place.
By default we'll run a container in --console=interactive and
--console=read-only mode depending if we are invoked on a tty or not so
that the container always gets a /dev/console allocated, i.e is always
suitable to run a full init system /as those typically expect a
/dev/console to exist).
With the new --console=autopipe mode we do something similar, but
slightly different: when not invoked on a tty we'll use --console=pipe.
This means, if you invoke some tool in a container with this you'll get
full inetractivity if you invoke it on a tty but things will also be
very nicely pipeable. OTOH you cannot invoke a full init system like
this, because you might or might not become a /dev/console this way...
Prompted-by: #17070
(I named this "autopipe" rather than "auto" or so, since the default
mode probably should be named "auto" one day if we add a name for it,
and this is so similar to "auto" except that it uses pipes in the
non-tty case).
Instead of first becoming a controlling process of the payload pty
as side effect of opening it (without O_NOCTTY), and then possibly
dropping it again, let's do it cleanly an reverse the logic: let's open
the pty without becoming its controller first. Only after everything
went the way we wanted it to go become the controller explicitly.
This has the benefit that the PID 1 stub process we run (as effect of
--as-pid2) doesn't have to lose the tty explicitly, but can just
continue running with things. And we explicitly make the tty controlling
right before invoking actual payload.
In order to make sure everything works as expected validate that the
stub PID 1 in the container really has no conrolling tty by issuing the
TIOCNOTTY tty and expecting ENOTTY, and log about it.
This shouldn't change behaviour much, it just makes thins a bit cleaner,
in particular as we'll not trigger SIGHUP on ourselves (since we are
controller and session leader) due to TIOCNOTTY which we then have to
explicitly ignore.
Lennart Poettering