See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1763488: when we say that
'foo@*.service' is not a valid unit name, this is not clear enough. Let's
include the name of the operation that does not support globbing in the
error message:
$ build/systemctl enable 'foo@*.service'
Glob pattern passed to enable, but globs are not supported for this.
Invalid unit name "foo@*.service" escaped as "foo@\x2a.service".
...
Takes a single /sys/fs/bpf/pinned_prog string as argument, but may be
specified multiple times. An empty assignment resets all previous filters.
Closes https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/10227
[zj: this is a subset of changes generated by clang-format, just the ones
I think improve readability or consistency.]
This is a part of https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/11811.
When `syscall_names_in_filter()` is called in itself, it is already
examined with `whitelist`. Or, in other words, `syscall_names_in_filter()`
returns bad or good in boolean. So, the returned value should not be
compared with `whitelist` again.
This replaces #11302.
Found by inspecting results of running this small program:
int main(int argc, const char **argv) {
for (int i = 1; i < argc; i++) {
FILE *f;
char line[1024], prev[1024], *r;
int lineno;
prev[0] = '\0';
lineno = 1;
f = fopen(argv[i], "r");
if (!f)
exit(1);
do {
r = fgets(line, sizeof(line), f);
if (!r)
break;
if (strcmp(line, prev) == 0)
printf("%s:%d: error: dup %s", argv[i], lineno, line);
lineno++;
strcpy(prev, line);
} while (!feof(f));
fclose(f);
}
}
This has been irritating me for quite a while: let's prefix these enum
values with a common prefix, like we do for almost all other enums.
No change in behaviour, just some renaming.
The new systemd analyze code dependend on routines provided by
libseccomp even if HAVE_SECCOMP is false. This expands the code disabled
in analyze-security to make sure we don't depend on seccomp.
