stdio-common: Add wide stream coverage to tst-vfprintf-user-type

And use TEST_COMPARE_STRING for the narrow tests.

Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella  <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Florian Weimer 2022-03-18 21:27:54 +01:00
parent 88ed43ff0c
commit 59c30d5708
1 changed files with 93 additions and 27 deletions

View File

@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
this indicates the number of such pairs which constitute the
argument. */
#include <array_length.h>
#include <locale.h>
#include <printf.h>
#include <stdio.h>
@ -60,13 +61,23 @@ my_printf_function (FILE *fp, const struct printf_info *info,
__func__, fp, info, args[0], args, (wint_t) info->spec,
info->prec);
TEST_COMPARE (info->wide, fwide (fp, 0) > 0);
TEST_VERIFY (info->spec == 'P');
size_t nargs;
int printed;
if (info->prec >= 0)
{
if (fputc ('{', fp) < 0)
return -1;
if (info->wide)
{
if (fputwc (L'{', fp) < 0)
return -1;
}
else
{
if (fputc ('{', fp) < 0)
return -1;
}
nargs = info->prec;
printed = 1;
}
@ -80,8 +91,16 @@ my_printf_function (FILE *fp, const struct printf_info *info,
{
if (i != 0)
{
if (fputc (',', fp) < 0)
return -1;
if (info->wide)
{
if (fputwc (L',', fp) < 0)
return -1;
}
else
{
if (fputc (',', fp) < 0)
return -1;
}
++printed;
}
@ -89,15 +108,27 @@ my_printf_function (FILE *fp, const struct printf_info *info,
and those pointers point to a pointer to the memory area
supplied to my_va_arg_function. */
struct two_argument *pair = *(void **) args[i];
int ret = fprintf (fp, "(%ld, %f)", pair->i, pair->d);
int ret;
if (info->wide)
ret = fwprintf (fp, L"(%ld, %f)", pair->i, pair->d);
else
ret = fprintf (fp, "(%ld, %f)", pair->i, pair->d);
if (ret < 0)
return -1;
printed += ret;
}
if (info->prec >= 0)
{
if (fputc ('}', fp) < 0)
return -1;
if (info->wide)
{
if (fputwc (L'}', fp) < 0)
return -1;
}
else
{
if (fputc ('}', fp) < 0)
return -1;
}
++printed;
}
return printed;
@ -155,30 +186,22 @@ do_test (void)
TEST_VERIFY (asprintf_alias == asprintf);
char *str = NULL;
TEST_VERIFY (asprintf_alias (&str, "[[%P]]", 123L, 456.0) >= 0);
if (test_verbose > 0)
printf ("info: %s\n", str);
TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (str, "[[(123, 456.000000)]]") == 0);
TEST_COMPARE_STRING (str, "[[(123, 456.000000)]]");
free (str);
str = NULL;
TEST_VERIFY (asprintf_alias (&str, "[[%1$P %1$P]]", 123L, 457.0) >= 0);
if (test_verbose > 0)
printf ("info: %s\n", str);
TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (str, "[[(123, 457.000000) (123, 457.000000)]]") == 0);
TEST_COMPARE_STRING (str, "[[(123, 457.000000) (123, 457.000000)]]");
free (str);
str = NULL;
TEST_VERIFY (asprintf_alias (&str, "[[%.1P]]", 1L, 2.0) >= 0);
if (test_verbose > 0)
printf ("info: %s\n", str);
TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (str, "[[{(1, 2.000000)}]]") == 0);
TEST_COMPARE_STRING (str, "[[{(1, 2.000000)}]]");
free (str);
str = NULL;
TEST_VERIFY (asprintf_alias (&str, "[[%.2P]]", 1L, 2.0, 3L, 4.0) >= 0);
if (test_verbose > 0)
printf ("info: %s\n", str);
TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (str, "[[{(1, 2.000000),(3, 4.000000)}]]") == 0);
TEST_COMPARE_STRING (str, "[[{(1, 2.000000),(3, 4.000000)}]]");
free (str);
str = NULL;
@ -187,14 +210,12 @@ do_test (void)
/* argument 1: */ 1L, 2.0, 3L, 4.0,
/* argument 2: */ 5L, 6.0, 7L, 8.0, 9L, 10.0)
>= 0);
if (test_verbose > 0)
printf ("info: %s\n", str);
TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (str,
TEST_COMPARE_STRING (str,
"[["
"{(1, 2.000000),(3, 4.000000)}"
" | "
"{(5, 6.000000),(7, 8.000000),(9, 10.000000)}"
"]]") == 0);
"]]");
free (str);
/* The following subtest fails due to bug 21534. */
@ -205,19 +226,64 @@ do_test (void)
/* argument 1: */ 1L, 2.0, 3L, 4.0,
/* argument 2: */ 5L, 6.0, 7L, 8.0, 9L, 10.0)
>= 0);
if (test_verbose > 0)
printf ("info: %s\n", str);
TEST_VERIFY (strcmp (str,
TEST_COMPARE_STRING (str,
"[["
"{(1, 2.000000),(3, 4.000000)}"
" | "
"{(5, 6.000000),(7, 8.000000),(9, 10.000000)}"
" | "
"{(1, 2.000000),(3, 4.000000)}"
"]]") == 0);
"]]");
free (str);
#endif
/* Wide variants of the tests above. */
wchar_t buf[200];
TEST_VERIFY (swprintf (buf, array_length (buf), L"[[%P]]", 123L, 456.0)
>= 0);
TEST_COMPARE_STRING_WIDE (buf, L"[[(123, 456.000000)]]");
TEST_VERIFY (swprintf (buf, array_length (buf), L"[[%1$P %1$P]]",
123L, 457.0) >= 0);
TEST_COMPARE_STRING_WIDE (buf, L"[[(123, 457.000000) (123, 457.000000)]]");
TEST_VERIFY (swprintf (buf, array_length (buf), L"[[%.1P]]", 1L, 2.0) >= 0);
TEST_COMPARE_STRING_WIDE (buf, L"[[{(1, 2.000000)}]]");
TEST_VERIFY (swprintf (buf, array_length (buf), L"[[%.2P]]",
1L, 2.0, 3L, 4.0) >= 0);
TEST_COMPARE_STRING_WIDE (buf, L"[[{(1, 2.000000),(3, 4.000000)}]]");
TEST_VERIFY (swprintf
(buf, array_length (buf), L"[[%.2P | %.3P]]",
/* argument 1: */ 1L, 2.0, 3L, 4.0,
/* argument 2: */ 5L, 6.0, 7L, 8.0, 9L, 10.0)
>= 0);
TEST_COMPARE_STRING_WIDE (buf,
L"[["
"{(1, 2.000000),(3, 4.000000)}"
" | "
"{(5, 6.000000),(7, 8.000000),(9, 10.000000)}"
"]]");
/* The following subtest fails due to bug 21534. */
#if 0
TEST_VERIFY (swprintf
(&buf, array_length (buf), L"[[%1$.2P | %2$.3P | %1$.2P]]",
/* argument 1: */ 1L, 2.0, 3L, 4.0,
/* argument 2: */ 5L, 6.0, 7L, 8.0, 9L, 10.0)
>= 0);
TEST_COMPARE_STRING_WIDE (buf,
L"[["
"{(1, 2.000000),(3, 4.000000)}"
" | "
"{(5, 6.000000),(7, 8.000000),(9, 10.000000)}"
" | "
"{(1, 2.000000),(3, 4.000000)}"
"]]");
#endif
return 0;
}