For low end embedded systems 4 MiB for each journal file is a lot of
memory. Journald will use at least 512 KiB even if JOURNAL_FILE_SIZE_MIN is
set to less than that so just use 512 KiB.
Let's make things more user-friendly and support for example
LimitAS=16G
rather than force users to always use LimitAS=16106127360.
The change is relevant for options:
[Default]Limit{FSIZE,DATA,STACK,CORE,RSS,AS,MEMLOCK,MSGQUEUE}
The patch introduces config_parse_bytes_limit(), it's the same as
config_parse_limit() but uses parse_size() tu support the suffixes.
Addresses: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1772
Use the "return log_error_errno(...)" idiom to have fewer curly braces.
The last hunk also fixes the return value of setup_journal(), but the
fix has no practical effect.
The basic setup for the well-known system and session buses is
now done in read-only files in ${datadir} (normally /usr/share).
See the NEWS entry for 1.9.18 for details.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus/tree/NEWS
Some guests (ARM, AArch64, x86-RHEL) have 'KVM' in the product name.
Look for that first in order to more precisely report "kvm" when
detecting a QEMU/KVM guest. Without this patch we report "qemu",
even if KVM acceleration is in use on ARM/AArch64 guests.
I've only tested a backported version of this and the previous
patch on an AArch64 guest (which worked). Of course it would be
nice to get regression testing on all guest types that depend on
dmi done.
ARM/AArch64 guests now have SMBIOS tables populated (when boot
with a late enough QEMU and a late enough AAVMF is used as the
bootloader). Furthermore, when booting ARM/AArch64 guests with
ACPI, the DT detection obviously no longer works, so we need
dmi detection.
afaict, this will fix a regression caused by commit 75f86906c5.
Where we used to report "kvm" before that patch, without this patch,
we would only report "qemu". The reason is because cpuid detection
must come before dmi detection. Also, both can safely come before
other xen heuristics. Untested.
'set-property' was missing from the list of known command.
Also a list of unit names will be proposed as next argument.
However no support on property names is provided since it would
require a hard coded list of them.
We already filter out 0, and as -1 is usually special (meaning infinity,
as in USEC_INFINITY) we should better not accept it either. Better safe
than sorry...
It is really unclear if we want to / have the resources to support this fully, so drop it
for now. It can easily be brought back if a killer usecase emerges.
Note that this code was never hooked up, so this does not remove any features.
