The comment is pointless, ECC systematically doesn't allow
encryption/decryption directly, only RSA does that. If you want to use
ECC for asymmetric encryption/decryption you have to combine it with key
exchange scheme and symmetric scheme. This all is not a limitation of
the Yubikey, hence don't claim so. It's just how ECC is.
Let's move the 3rd way how cryptsetup acquires key files to
read_file_full() too.
Since load_key_file()'s raison d'etre now is just the search path logic,
let's rename the function to find_key_file().
Previously, we'd load the file with libcryptsetup's calls. Let's do that
in our own, so that we can make use of READ_FULL_FILE_CONNECT_SOCKET,
i.e. read in keys via AF_UNIX sockets, so that people can plug key
providers into our logic.
This provides functionality similar to Debian's keyscript= crypttab
option (see → #3007), as it allows key scripts to be run as socket
activated services, that have stdout connected to the activated socket.
In contrast to traditional keyscript= support this logic runs stuff out
of process however, which is beneficial, since it allows sandboxing and
similar.
Commit 428a9f6f1d freed u->pids which is
problematic since the references to this unit in m->watch_pids were no more
removed when the unit was freed.
This patch makes sure to clean all this refs up before freeing u->pids by
calling unit_unwatch_all_pids().
This fixes the following warning:
```
parse_hwdb.py:120: UserWarning: warn_ungrouped_named_tokens_in_collection: setting results name 'SETTINGS*' on And expression collides with 'HZ' on contained expression
dpi_setting = (Optional('*')('DEFAULT') + INTEGER('DPI') + Suppress('@') + INTEGER('HZ'))('SETTINGS*')
```
Not sure about for the mount_matrix, but LGTM.com warns in that line,
and, adding Group() does not change the parse result.
This reverts the gist of da1921a5c3 and
0d9fca76bb (for ppc).
Quoting #17559:
> libseccomp 2.5 added socket syscall multiplexing on ppc64(el):
> https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/pull/229
>
> Like with i386, s390 and s390x this breaks socket argument filtering, so
> RestrictAddressFamilies doesn't work.
>
> This causes the unit test to fail:
> /* test_restrict_address_families */
> Operating on architecture: ppc
> Failed to install socket family rules for architecture ppc, skipping: Operation canceled
> Operating on architecture: ppc64
> Failed to add socket() rule for architecture ppc64, skipping: Invalid argument
> Operating on architecture: ppc64-le
> Failed to add socket() rule for architecture ppc64-le, skipping: Invalid argument
> Assertion 'fd < 0' failed at src/test/test-seccomp.c:424, function test_restrict_address_families(). Aborting.
>
> The socket filters can't be added so `socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0);` still
> works, triggering the assertion.
Fixes#17559.
Lennart Poettering