Define explicit action "kill" for SystemCallErrorNumber=.
In addition to errno code, allow specifying "kill" as action for
SystemCallFilter=.
---
v7: seccomp_parse_errno_or_action() returns -EINVAL if !HAVE_SECCOMP
v6: use streq_ptr(), let errno_to_name() handle bad values, kill processes,
init syscall_errno
v5: actually use seccomp_errno_or_action_to_string(), don't fail bus unit
parsing without seccomp
v4: fix build without seccomp
v3: drop log action
v2: action -> number
On centos7 ci:
--- test-libcrypt-util begin ---
Found container virtualization none.
/* test_hash_password */
ew3bU1.hoKk4o: yes
$1$gc5rWpTB$wK1aul1PyBn9AX1z93stk1: no
$2b$12$BlqcGkB/7BFvNMXKGxDea.5/8D6FTny.cbNcHW/tqcrcyo6ZJd8u2: no
$5$lGhDrcrao9zb5oIK$05KlOVG3ocknx/ThreqXE/gk.XzFFBMTksc4t2CPDUD: no
$6$c7wB/3GiRk0VHf7e$zXJ7hN0aLZapE.iO4mn/oHu6.prsXTUG/5k1AxpgR85ELolyAcaIGRgzfwJs3isTChMDBjnthZyaMCfCNxo9I.: no
$y$j9T$$9cKOWsAm4m97WiYk61lPPibZpy3oaGPIbsL4koRe/XD: no
This lets the libc/xcrypt allocate as much storage area as it needs.
Should fix#16965:
testsuite-46.sh[74]: ==74==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address 0x7f3e972e1080 at pc 0x7f3e9be8deed bp 0x7ffce4f28530 sp 0x7ffce4f27ce0
testsuite-46.sh[74]: WRITE of size 131232 at 0x7f3e972e1080 thread T0
testsuite-46.sh[74]: #0 0x7f3e9be8deec (/usr/lib/clang/10.0.1/lib/linux/libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.so+0x9feec)
testsuite-46.sh[74]: #1 0x559cd05a6412 in user_record_make_hashed_password /systemd-meson-build/../build/src/home/user-record-util.c:818:21
testsuite-46.sh[74]: #2 0x559cd058fb03 in create_home /systemd-meson-build/../build/src/home/homectl.c:1112:29
testsuite-46.sh[74]: #3 0x7f3e9b5b3058 in dispatch_verb /systemd-meson-build/../build/src/shared/verbs.c:103:24
testsuite-46.sh[74]: #4 0x559cd058c101 in run /systemd-meson-build/../build/src/home/homectl.c:3325:16
testsuite-46.sh[74]: #5 0x559cd058c00a in main /systemd-meson-build/../build/src/home/homectl.c:3328:1
testsuite-46.sh[74]: #6 0x7f3e9a88b151 in __libc_start_main (/usr/lib/libc.so.6+0x28151)
testsuite-46.sh[74]: #7 0x559cd0583e7d in _start (/usr/bin/homectl+0x24e7d)
testsuite-46.sh[74]: Address 0x7f3e972e1080 is located in stack of thread T0 at offset 32896 in frame
testsuite-46.sh[74]: #0 0x559cd05a60df in user_record_make_hashed_password /systemd-meson-build/../build/src/home/user-record-util.c:789
testsuite-46.sh[74]: This frame has 6 object(s):
testsuite-46.sh[74]: [32, 40) 'priv' (line 790)
testsuite-46.sh[74]: [64, 72) 'np' (line 791)
testsuite-46.sh[74]: [96, 104) 'salt' (line 809)
testsuite-46.sh[74]: [128, 32896) 'cd' (line 810)
testsuite-46.sh[74]: [33152, 33168) '.compoundliteral' <== Memory access at offset 32896 partially underflows this variable
testsuite-46.sh[74]: [33184, 33192) 'new_array' (line 832) <== Memory access at offset 32896 partially underflows this variable
testsuite-46.sh[74]: HINT: this may be a false positive if your program uses some custom stack unwind mechanism, swapcontext or vfork
testsuite-46.sh[74]: (longjmp and C++ exceptions *are* supported)
testsuite-46.sh[74]: SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow (/usr/lib/clang/10.0.1/lib/linux/libclang_rt.asan-x86_64.so+0x9feec)
It seems 'struct crypt_data' is 32896 bytes, but libclang_rt wants more, at least 33168?
Two functional changes:
- "/" is now refused. The test is adjusted.
- The trailing NUL is *not* included in the returned size for abstract size. The
comments in sockaddr_un_set_path() indicate that this is the right thing to do,
and the code in socket_address_parse() wasn't doing that.
Closes#12624.
The formatting in systemd.socket.xml is updated a bit.
Currently in_addr_port_ifindex_name_to_string() always prints the ifindex
numerically. This is not super useful since the interface numbers are
semi-random. Should we use interface names in preference?
We would set .type to a fake value. All real callers (outside of tests)
immediately overwrite .type with a proper value after calling
socket_address_parse(). So let's not set it and adjust the few places
that relied on it being set to the fake value.
socket_address_parse() is modernized to only set the output argument on
success.
We would use the return value from the tested function to decide
what to print as "expected", which is confusing when something is wrong
with the tested function.
This is useful for duplicating trees that contain hardlinks: we keep
track of potential hardlinks and try to reproduce them within the
destination tree. (We do not hardlink between source and destination!).
This is useful for trees like ostree images which heavily use hardlinks
and which are otherwise exploded into separate copies of all files when
we duplicate the trees.
Behaviour is not identical, as shown by the tests in test-strv.
The combination of EXTRACT_UNQUOTE without EXTRACT_RELAX only appears in
the test, so it doesn't seem particularly important. OTOH, the difference
in handling of squished parameters could make a difference. New behaviour
is what both bash and python do, so I think we can ignore this corner case.
This change has the following advantages:
- the duplication of code paths that do a very similar thing is removed
- extract_one_word() / strv_split_extract() return a proper error code.
This is useful information, I don't know why we forgot to add it there.
gcc doesn't like arithemetic on a pointer to a function or void*, so don't
print signedness info there. It doesn't matter anyway.
C says function pointers can be different... Though I guess our code isn't
prepared for that.
If the directory (/var/lib/private is most likely) has borked permissions, the
test will fail with a cryptic message and EXIT_STATE_DIRECTORY or similar. The
message from the child with more details gets lost somewhere. Let's avoid running
the test in that case and provide a simple error message instead.
E.g. systemd-238-12.git07f8cd5.fc28.ppc64 (which I encountered on a test machine)
has /var/lib/private with 0755.
I had to move STRV_MAKE to macro.h. There is a circular dependency between
extract-word.h, strv.h, and string-util.h that makes it hard to define the
inline function otherwise.
This is cleaner that way given that we create our own half-virtualizes
device tree, and really shouldn't pull selinux labelling and access
control into that, we can only lose, in particular as our overmounted
/sys/ actually lacks /sys/fs/selinux.
(This fixes udev test woes introduced by #16821 where suddenly the test
would fail because libselinux assumed selinux was on, but selinuxfs
wasn't actually available)
Lennart Poettering